Process & Red Flags

How Does the Corinth Group Advance Fee Process Work?

Multiple independent complainants describe a consistent process by which advance fees are collected by the Corinth Group network. The following description is based on attributed third-party statements from complainants on multiple platforms and analysis of contract documents. [Source: Ripoff Report, Diebewertung.de, contract analysis]

Step 1: Initial Contact and Presentation

Complainants describe being approached or introduced to the Corinth Group through intermediaries, brokers, or direct outreach. The investment opportunity is presented using professional-looking materials that reference the Swiss AGs, the institutional investment experience of the principals, and the Morepen Laboratories deal as evidence of track record. The website cgoch.com claims entities in multiple jurisdictions and describes "Registered and Licensed Investment Funds." [Source: Complainant statements, cgoch.com]

Step 2: The Term Sheet / Cost Contribution Agreement

A formal-looking term sheet or cost contribution agreement is presented. This document typically requires the prospective investor to pay advance fees — reported amounts range from EUR 50,000 to EUR 1.5 million. The agreement includes clauses promising return of fees if the transaction is not completed. Specific contract provisions identified include: Article 26 refund clauses, Article 5.6 termination "for whatever reason," Article 6.1 termination for matters "beyond control," and Article 6.6 termination for "material changes." [Source: Contract document analysis, complainant statements]

Step 3: Payment

Fees are paid, typically via international bank transfer. Complainants describe attentive communication from the Corinth team before and during the payment process. [Source: Complainant statements]

Step 4: Delays and Excuses

After payment, complainants consistently describe a pattern of delays. Transaction timelines are repeatedly extended with various explanations. Multiple complainants report receiving identical or very similar explanations, including references to external factors such as US tariff changes and bank policy shifts. The specificity and consistency of these explanations across different complainants and different time periods is documented in the fraud report platforms. [Source: Ripoff Report, Diebewertung.de]

Step 5: No Funding, No Refund

Ultimately, no investment transaction is completed, and no return of the advance fees occurs. Complainants describe the interaction of the contractual clauses — the refund promise is effectively negated by the termination provisions, which provide multiple grounds for the Corinth Group to terminate the arrangement without triggering the refund obligation. [Source: Contract analysis, complainant statements]

This description is based on attributed third-party statements and contract analysis. Readers should evaluate the evidence independently.

Related Investigations

Have You Been Affected?

If you have information about any of the people or entities described on this site, your account could help ongoing investigations and other affected parties.

Contact Us Confidentially